![]() Then I squash-merge my old branch into that new branch, delete the old branch, and rename the new branch to daves-feature. I check out the base branch and create a new branch from it, daves-feature-new. Luckily, there is a way to achieve the high-level objective without having to dance through the commit history: $ git switch parent complicated to say the least, and there's no guarantee it's even possible in every case (for example, what if the merge resolution depends on changes introduced in 77bfbf7?) Rewriting this history so that the rebase goes off cleanly is. ![]() But the rebase applies my commits in order on top of the latest commit on parent, which means my merge conflict resolution is in the wrong place. A while ago I published some basic git commands to that go slightly beyond basic cloning and commits, and should handle most git interactions. I resolved those merge conflicts at commit b99aef1, when I merged the base branch into my branch. Im not a git expert but I know enough git to get by, and surely know enough git to appreciate its ease of use over svn. I can't rebase because although my branch currently does not have merge conflicts, at commitħ7bfbf7, it did. To abort and get back to the state before "git rebase", run "git rebase -abort". You can instead skip this commit: run "git rebase -skip". "git add/rm ", then run "git rebase -continue". With these, you can easily merge little fixes with the original feature and keep your branch clean. Resolve all conflicts manually, mark them as resolved with A few time ago, I discovered two useful options in GIT that work together : git commit -fixup and git rebase -autosquash. ![]() Essentially, I'd like my Pull Request to depict the outcome of GitHub's "Squash and Merge" operation.īut when I do git rebase -i parent, I get error: could not apply 77bfbf7. I want to rebase this branch to squash it into a single, clean commit that I can merge into parent, the new base branch. (In retrospect, this was a mistake - I should have rebased then). In addition to lots of WIP commits, I've got a merge of my new base branch, parent, there in the middle of my commit history. I do not use squash (to flatten commits), but I rebase to avoid the extra merge commits. At this point I always do a pull -rebase. You are in your work commit work commit cycle. My commit history looks like this: ac1f97e (HEAD -> daves-feature) Hush, PyrightĬ18fe09 Working parallelization with passing tests I think you should use git pull -rebase when collaborating with others on the same branch. I started my branch from main, but later realized it was better suited to be based on parent. So by prefixing the commit message with either fixup! or squash! followed by the wording of the commit message to be squashed into, an interactive rebase will setup the todo list for you automatically.I've got a really ugly branch ( daves-feature) going. , automatically modify the todo list of rebase -i so that the commit marked for squashing comes right after the commit to be modified, and change the action of the moved commit from pick to squash (or fixup). "), and there is a commit whose title begins with the same. When the commit log message begins with "squash!. That is where -autosquash comes into the picture. This cleans up your commits, but it can be tedious if you have more than just a few commits you want to squash. You can do an rebase -interactive (or git rebase -i for short), and change the commit line from a pick to a fixup and place the commit beneath the commit to be squashed into. ![]() Later on, I make some additional changes to the same file on the same lines, and I want to squash these changes into the first commit touching the file. Did anyone mention how easy it is to do on IntelliJ IDEA UI: Go to git window Manually select all the commits you want to merge into one. When working in a feature branch, I make some changes to a file and then commit these changes.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |